Talk:Opinion piece

Vbbn

US-centric

The world is a big place, the USA is one country, and only the third largest by population at that. Much of the content, almost all, of this article should be moved to the article on the American press. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.153.172 (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wikitorial?

I heard bill gates is the richest man that such an effort might be better suited for wikipedia. Of course, the problem is that it violates nearly every wikipedia policy I can think of. NPOV, which is supposed to be a "non-negotiable" policy, for example. Of the 4 key policies listed on the policies and guidelines page, it would violate 2 and would doubtless lead to the violation of a 3rd (respect other authors), and goes on to violate, by my count, 3 more policies and guidelines. Perhaps it would be better outside of wikipedia and in a sister project, like wikibooks or wiktionary. But I have no idea how to propose something like this, so I thought I'd just drop the idea. Done. --2tothe4 19:23, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think that's a fascinating idea! 128.12.20.195 21:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is somethign I came across while reading an ancient tamil book( Scriptures). It says editorial -- surprisingly as "edu" "ittor "iyal" where "edu" mean book or magazine, "ittor" means publisher or writer and "iyal" means field, so I was able to conclude that editorial was nothing but the comments of the publisher/writer about the book. Can anyone trace the history of the word, I am thinking that this should have been formed ( or came into existance) when british ruled india. Any Comments/suggestions, welcome..

Editorial vs. Op-Ed?

My understanding was that an "editorial" is a non-bylined piece that represents the culmulative, official position of the entire editorial staff. But an "op-ed" piece is by-lined (i.e., credited to a specific author) and represents his opinion and his alone. Traditionally, editorials are on the left-side pages of a newspaper and op-eds are on a right-side page -- although that isn't universally true. Is this really the case? Should such a distinction be in this article? Joe 16:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's the first thing that came to my mind after reading current article where editorial and op-ed are made the same. I thought that editorial and op-ed are different and opposing each other in some way. Compare definitions with Google Google define:op-ed . It looks like a Op-ed should go into separate article --iLAVA 15:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this can easily be resolved by providing a fuller explanation of each. For now, I propose splitting the content of the page into sections. The term op-ed can also apply to a guest opinion column placed in, or solicited an opinion page editor. Jkaplan 06:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted a rewrite of the opening paragraph to reflect the distinction. The terms are used confusingly throughout the article--e.g., a line about "the editorial page" of the New York Times actually lists its op-ed columnists. Also the term "opinion page" is used frequently, but not defined; it's equivalent to "op-ed page," although, as we know, the "op" isn't short for "opinion". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.226.240.147 (talk) 16:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I support the idea of giving the 'op-ed' its own page; they're two different animals. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.42.213.167 (talk) 10:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Op-Ed stands for...

In the first paragraph of this article, it appears to me as though op-ed is defined as standing for "opinion editorial" AND as "a combination of the words "opposite" and "editorial."" So, which is it? Opposite or opinion? Once we figure that out, perhaps we can also figure out if the above "Editorial vs. Op-Ed" section will split this article into two articles. I'll look around to see if I can find anything official to cite on these issues. --Rcronk 18:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merrium-Webster Online says that an editorial is:

a newspaper or magazine article that gives the opinions of the editors or publishers; also : an expression of opinion that resembles such an article <a television editorial>

and an op-ed (Etymology: short for opposite editorial) is:

a page of special features usually opposite the editorial page of a newspaper; also : a feature on such a page

Answers.com American Word Origins explains it well also. I'll tweak the first paragraph op-ed definition conflict if someone else wants to handle the editorial vs. op-ed issue. --Rcronk 19:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rcronk, see my note above. I've attempted a serious re-write of the article, and broken it down into sections, hoping to clear up the differences between and op-ed and an editorial. Does anyone think we should split this entry into two pages--one for "op-ed" and one for "editorial"? Jkaplan 06:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of "op/ed" standing for "opposite editorials" still needs better verification than the above. Right now it still sounds fishy, like the old falsehood that "posh" meaning "fancy" stands for "port out, starboard home". If this assertion is to be kept in the article, it needs to be verified in a reliable source and cited properly. Mmyers1976 (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it does stand for "opposite (the) editorials", in reference to their physical position, not their ideological one. It's an explanation I've seen in the New York Times (who coined the term) on a few occasions. After a little digging, I found this William Safire column from 2005 that cites it [1]oknazevad (talk) 03:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ASME guidelines

The American Society of Magazine Editors has developed a list of editorial guidelines, to which a majority of magazine editors commonly adhere.[2]

I checked the reference and the "editorial content" they are referring to is in distinction to advertising content. They are not using the term "editorial" to mean opinion pieces but rather non-advertising material. Unless someone object I'm going to remove the sentence. -Will Beback · † · 06:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paradox?

Right now, the first paragraph says that an editorial is a piece of writing that is usually placed on the opposite page of the editorial, which sounds strange to my ears. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.70.178.47 (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Editorial boards

"The editorial board is a group of vaginas,..." - ahem, do u think that this is true? --Tmilovan 14:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editorial

Why do we have an editorial page? Is it sop editors can give their opinion and we can see then agree and disagree about what they are saying? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.75.50.159 (talk) 21:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an Important Page

As a journalist and a member of an organization who's sole purpose is to separate news from editorializing I find that this page has vital information on this subject. Myraedison 00:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would also seem that it is prone to vandalism.

Actually, Myraedison reminds me of an important point. The rigid separation (at least in theory) between news and editorialising in the US press is not replicated here in the UK. It's taken as read that the tabloid press, in particular but not exclusively, will slant its news coverage according to the views of its editor/proprietor. This has always been the case, and most people don't consider it a bad thing in and of itself - they only dislike it when the views don't correspond to their own! 86.143.48.55 (talk) 04:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Ref 1 no longer exists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.134.52 (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reference number 2 gives 404 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasaalan (talk • contribs) 15:59, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Editorial Page and Cleanup

I noticed that it's suggested that this be merged with the Editorial Page article. I think that's a good idea but I would recommend striking out the comment about the most common location for editorials, since I don't actually know of a paper in my area where that's true (I live in Chicago, checked the Trib and the Sun Times and the Red Eye as well as my own school newspaper, for which I am the Editorials section editor).

Further, this article is in serious need of cleanup. Editorials are different from Opinion pieces, this article reads like they are the same (an editorial has way more limitations, and it needs to be more then just an opinion, it needs to be an interpretation of this opinion relevant to current news, and of course, it can't be extremely biased or otherwise libelous). It's poorly structured and the like, with minimal sources for facts. Dylan (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to new title

I've moved the original Editorial article to Opinion piece and created a new article Editorial from some pieces of the old one. --Lambiam 12:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Artículo de opinión

F 201.162.243.12 (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]