User talk:MSGJ

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Please do not create nonexistent templates

Please do not create transclusions of nonexistent templates. It populates Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates, and then another gnome needs to fix your fix. I recommend removing one of the braces on either end instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create a template — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I misspoke. You created transclusions of nonexistent templates. Please refrain from doing so. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Chris M Horwitz (16:47, 22 September 2024)

Hello. I have made two edits recentlly, the more important of which was in Maxwell's Equations where there is a significantly wrong original entry which has been leading people astray for a long time. My correction was however removed without any communication with me. I would think Wikipedia would be using competent members to consider proposed edits but in this case I consider this to be an egregious lack of knowledge of the topic; someone expert in the field should re-consider my edit. At the very least I would expect the editor would communicate with me. For the second edit, on the history of William Shockley, I have had a helpful discussion with the editor who removed my edit - and that is fine, I will work on it and re-submit after I have downloaded the appropriate reference to your Commons. --Chris M Horwitz (talk) 16:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So if your edit is reverted, the next step is usually to open a discussion on the talk page, in this case Talk:Maxwell's equations. There you can present your point of view or ask the other editor to explain why they reverted. I will open a discussion there for you now — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris M Horwitz there is a response on the article's talk page. Please view and reply there — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my proposed edit; after looking over the correct cross-product terms it's apparent that the moving diagram and its attendant field equations are correct as shown. My apologies for trying to spread disinformation! Chris M Horwitz (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from The scribeman (00:00, 25 September 2024)

Hi! While I was editing I found out some anti social editors reverted my edits with a personal agenda of defaming a particular caste group. It is very immoral to defame and spread mis informations about a particular community. Help me protect that page people constantly alter the page with misinformations I shall provide you legit government records supporting my side of informations. Thankyou --The scribeman (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jly44 (18:29, 28 September 2024)

Hi Martin can you write and edit it for me? --Jly44 (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Write or edit what? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Worldpeaceisthebestthing (04:07, 29 September 2024)

Hi Martin, You sound cool. --Worldpeaceisthebestthing (talk) 04:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320

Online events:

New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon

Tip of the month:

Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Question from JaneBetTol (22:31, 29 September 2024)

I need to correct a mistake that a member of the public added to my bio. I tried three times to do it and save it on my laptop but couldn’t do it. Not sure why. Now trying on my iPhone. Can you help me? --JaneBetTol (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Safiahhafiez (18:00, 9 October 2024)

Hi there, can I outright edit a page that needs amendment if I am the source of the authentic content? Why would it be removed later on by the creator? For example, I credited my name in my own work which was not included. --Safiahhafiez (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Saw a creature on your userpage

Hello there, i saw your image. Who was is 77.77.219.225 (talk) 20:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:QuickStatements link

Template:QuickStatements link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Valencia9376 (14:35, 14 October 2024)

Martin, Good Morning. I’m in the US in the Mountain Standard Time zone. In the article on automorphic numbers I think it’s missing the number 1951 as an automorphic number. I wanted to point that out to the author on the article. I may be wrong, I’m not a mathematician per se, so I’m asking if that number should be included in the list of automorphic numbers. Phillip --Valencia9376 (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert but 1951 does not seem to meet the criteria described on that page. The square of 1951 is 3806401 — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]