User talk:Dave Farquhar

This user may have left Wikipedia. Dave Farquhar has not edited Wikipedia since 22 May 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Dear Dave, I have seen you created the toy manufacturer site "Dorfan". I want to write a site "Jos. Kraus & Co." -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jos._Kraus_%26_Co. - in english language. Because at the moment only exists in german. These 2 companies depend on each other. Would be fine, if you would take a look at the new created site. Thank you very much. Jener13 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jener13 (talk • contribs) 08:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dave - thank you for the article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danielle_Bunten_Berry - I am contacting you because we are currently working on making (or in some cases adding to existing) wikipedia pages for women and underrepresented minorities who made contributions to Atari games in the 70s and 80s - and Danielle Bunten Berry is on our list. Therefore, we hope that you will welcome the few add-on to include her in the [Women project], which is also part of [in Red] - cheers DrFancyGenius

— Preceding unsigned comment added by DrFancyGenius (talk • contribs) 23:57, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Dave, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, nice work on the Jimmie Foxx article. Cheers! --maveric149

Nice work on the Billy Mitchell entry, Dave! Tannin

Yup, great work! It is a good article. Danny

I just wanted to compliment your P. T. Barnum article. It's wonderful. After seeing some of your frustrations on your user page, you might want to compare the Joan Baez article with the Crass article. Oh, well ... Danny

Oi! It's not my fault I know my stuff on Crass! and look on the bright side, at least having a short article on Joan Baez means it doesn't get 'michaelised' as often!!! :-) quercus robur 19:52 Apr 8, 2003 (UTC)

Sorry for confusion over Image talk:Btwashington.jpg - I hope it's all cleared up. Though I'm a bit baffled about you uploading it, since the log says Black Widow - or is there an older version that isn't showing? -- Tarquin 22:19 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)

This is from the Library of Congress website:

Although the Library cannot grant permission for use of images, it does request that the following credit line be used to assist in identifying images: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division [reproduction number, e.g., LC-USZ62-110212].. Even if the photograph's copyright was not in question, you did not comply with this requirement. -- Zoe

This is a joint effort. If one person does something that causes the project to be taken down, we all suffer. We appreciate the work that many people do, including you, but you have to realize the consequences of a misstep. -- Zoe

Never mind the consequences of torquing off contributors for no really good reason. You can fix missteps and then point them out, but I guess that doesn't give you a power trip. I'm glad that now I know your priorities. -- Dave Farquhar 12:42 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)

"How I wish I'd stuck to topics nobody cares about. Like Tip O'Neill."

Why do you think I stick to Crass mate??? quercus robur

Amen to that. Or concentrate my efforts on my own venue. The power trips here are nauseating. -- Dave Farquhar 12:42 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)

Dave, I just wanted to tell you that I have removed your Lockheed U-2 pic for one which I believe is much better. I apologise if you are at all offended but I just want the best possible encyclopedia. I have not deleted your actual upload so, if you disagree with my move, just revert me. Best Wishes -- Adrian Pingstone 20:12 Apr 19, 2003 (UTC)

Dave, I hope you don't leave for good. Long before there was a such thing as a "sysop" around here I, among other Wikipedians, strongly advocated that we don't give out "superpowers" like permenant deletion and IP blocking to some people but not others. I do believe most of the people who freely exercise those powers without using the checks and balances we've tried to put in place (like Wikipedia:Votes for deletion) do so with good intentions; however, the results are unfortunate.

By the way, I like your blog. I hope you don't pan us in it. :) -- Stephen Gilbert 18:58 Apr 28, 2003 (UTC)

Hi Dave. I was wondering if you could provide a source, notes, anything on the nature of the Amiga/Atari relationship in 1984? I haven't seen anything in print, and "the story" always implies that Tramiel basically told them to go jump when he took over Atari - this is the version I used in the Commodore article. However your comments in Jay Miner essentially reverse this, saying that Tramiel was scooped by Commodore after he left. Can you clear this up for me?

User:Maury Markowitz

I hope you don't mind that I moved Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod to Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. I updated your link, too. BTW, great dissertation.

Emperorbma 08:13 3 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for those pointers on the Amiga story Dave! User:Maury Markowitz

Hey David Tip O'Neill has an article it is not much certainly no Britany Spears :) Smith03 02:20, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Hi, I never heard of a Commodore 116. (just under Commodore 16 in List of home computers). Are you sure it's not an error? At18 23:18, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

No, it's not a typo. But the 116 is very, very obscure. Do a Google search and you'll find a few pictures of it (along with a whole lot more than you ever wanted to know about that particular computer line). Basically it looks like a Plus/4 with a chicklet keyboard. I linked it to the C-16 article and mentioned it briefly there just because it really doesn't deserve another entry--from a software standpoint it's a C-16, and from a user standpoint it's really just a C-16 with a horrific keyboard and a cooler-looking case. Dave Farquhar 03:42, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. I never suspected its existance :-) At18 14:39, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

I for one am confused by the difference between scale and gauge as applied to model railways. (G-scale, but S-gauge.) Are they synonomous? Since you have contributed on this subject, could you perhaps tidy-up model railway, or perhaps add an explanation? Anjouli 15:58, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Sure. I'll add it to the article, but the difference is pretty simple. Gauge is the measurement of the track. Scale is the model's measurement in relation to the original. Dave Farquhar 04:30, 4 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Thanks

Dave, according to User:Tom harrison's post at Wikipedia:New user log, your article at Silicon Underground was responsible for him finding and becoming an editor at this site. I just wanted to say thanks: I understand the frustrations you expressed in your article, but I'm glad you still say positive things about us, and I hope we can have you back here more often in the future. You seem like exactly the sort of intelligent, practical personality that is present in most of our most successful editors. Thanks for dropping by now and then, and I hope to see you around in the future, Jwrosenzweig 04:16, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)

A2500

Dave, much as I loved my old Amigas, and instantly knew what A2500 (probably) referred to, I suspect that few people would ever find it under that title. You might consider moving the article to 'Amiga 2500', or roll it into the 'Amiga' article. Just a suggestion. --Brian Rock 02:53, May 24, 2004 (UTC)

Good idea. I just created the entry where I did because that's where msg:cbm points. I think I'll move it, and then let the redirect hit it. I agree "Amiga [model]" is a much better name than "A[model]". One has to have been a pretty hard-core Amigan to recognize them that way 10 years after Commodore's implosion. :) --Dave Farquhar 16:22, 24 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Dravecky

Hello Dave. I've made some contributions for Dravecky. It's a nice article. My regards. MusiCitizen 14:53, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks. --Dave Farquhar 06:01, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

You got it. Dave Farquhar 15:40, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.

Jesse james.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Jesse james.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exley

As you seem to know a bit about model railways and bearing in mind that 'it is not currently trading' do Exley deserve an article? TAS 17:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for asking. I know a lot more about U.S. manufacturers than I do about UK manufacturers, but I believe Exley has historical significance. It is of more interest to collectors of antiques/toys/trains than it is to current-day model railway hobbyists, but I believe those are legitimate (and growing) audiences. I wish the article were longer, but that could happen yet. I may even be able to dig up more information for it. Does that answer your question? Dave Farquhar 19:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I will expand it if I can find out more. TAS 16:15, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Frederick Muhlenberg

Hi Dave, would you upload Image:Muhlenberg.jpg to Commons, too, please? This way, I could use it in the German wikipedia, too. Thank You / Dankeschön --Concord 01:16, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball on Wikicities

Hello Dave Farquhar, Googie Man here and I want to ask you something as a fellow baseball fan on Wikipedia. Jimbo and Angela have made a new webstie called Wikicities. This link in particular will take you to the baseball Wikicity. As you'll see it's similar to Wikipedia, but my hope is this will allow baseball fans to do more and different things, like reporting on games, in depth statistics, create mulitple pages for pictures, and whatever else baseball fans care to create. You've done great work on Wikipedia and I was hoping you could help get this baseball Wikicity off the ground. Please let me know what you think either at my talk page, or you can email me at terry@wikia.com. Thanks! Googie Man^(Talk), 16:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Comment on Polystyrene toxicity

I was doing some research on foams that are suitable for cutting with a hot-wire cutter, and I came across your comment in the "polystyrene" section.

I'm curious to know if you ever found out if it is, or isn't safe to cut this type of foam with a wire cutter. I did find this PDF on google, that I thought was interesting...

http://www.eumeps.org/pdfs/behaviour.pdf

All in all, it seems to have a fairly low toxicity. Just make sure you do your cutting in a well-ventilated area. That's what I'm hearing, anyway. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.101.95.236 (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

MTH article

Hi Dave,

I've posted to the talk page for the MTH article.Your input would be greatly appreciated. Berean Hunter (talk) 14:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) has smiled at you! Smiles are good! and hopefully this one has made your day better. Why not smile at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend? Happy editing!

k-line

dude u made the k-line article- why don't you have it listed in your article list?? Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Cousin" Dave

Just wanted to drop you a line thanking you (six years after the fact) for getting the Dave Dravecky article off to such a good start. I'm not actually related to Dave, as far as I know, but with this last name how could I not take an interest in his career. Oh, and I love your user page (and your confession to your "crimes") but, good news!, Tip O'Neill is a solid B-class article these days. - Dravecky (talk) 08:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Trainmaster Command Control and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Trainmaster Command Control, Digital Command System. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainmaster Command Control for Trainmaster Command Control, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Command System for Digital Command System. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Five_forks.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Five_forks.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dave Farquhar! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 674 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jared Sandberg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Beny Alagem - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joe Charboneau - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kevin Seitzer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of High rail

The article High rail has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references ("High rail" "O scale" S scale") did not find support to meet the requirements of WP:N for the content of this article as written. gbooks gets 4 hits, 2 are mirrors and the other 2 don't seem to support the premise of the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Hanna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Hanna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis!

Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louis photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, around noon in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of McCoy Manufacturing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McCoy Manufacturing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McCoy Manufacturing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wolfson5 (talk) 02:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fandor

The article Fandor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Model railroad manufacturers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Model railroad manufacturers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Linn Westcott

The article Linn Westcott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this entire article, which was created in 14 years ago, reads as original research WP:OR with not a single citation to support any of what has been written.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

"Steve Howe (basseball player)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Steve Howe (basseball player). Since you had some involvement with the Steve Howe (basseball player) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 05:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Whitby Allen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Whitby Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Whitby Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Euclid316 (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]