Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/25 Years of Beauty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 00:07, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. --W(t) 04:42, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
- Vanity. But written just sneakily enough to avoid a speedy. Delete --Barfooz (talk) 05:04, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Why should we give points for creativity? A pile of poo referred to as "a large amount of that which helps roses to grow" still stinks. --Xcali 05:49, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. This doesn't appear to fall within the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. --bainer (talk) 08:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. — Knowledge Seeker দ 09:09, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete obviously vanity Bluemoose 09:15, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity nonsense. -- BD2412 talk 18:54, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
- Delete and ban this user, how many of these does he have to create before someone does something?!? - Jersyko talk 22:11, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
- He's been blocked for 96 hours for his latest Fructose Addiction article, after he promised he would stop posting POV material. This is his third block. Next time will be 8 days. RickK 22:32, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 00:03, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment An album of 9 songs dedicated to one girl in his computer science class? That poor girl . . . - Jersyko talk 02:36, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete argh not again. Vanity. --Kiand 19:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- keep good song, good performance, good article, andrew, go easy on the s.d.s. issue!!! Agata Bugaj 08:58, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Users first and only contribution to the Wikipedia. --Kiand 09:33, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I've been informed by Agata (a real-life friend of mine) that this user isn't her, but is some account created using her name. --NeuronExMachina 00:43, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP!!! Good work 68.170.0.238 14:07, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Article author. --Kiand 14:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Andrew wrote a good song and performed it for us. Richard Morrison 14:09, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Users first and only contibution to the Wikipedia. --Kiand 14:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Same reason as Richard. Dan Smith 2 14:10, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Users first and only contibution to the Wikipedia. --Kiand 14:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep article sounds OK with me ...Thomas H Johnson 14:13, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Users first and only contibution to the Wikipedia. --Kiand 14:14, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Also, in view of the user's only other edit, most likely a sockpuppet of Andrew Lin (the article's author, aka 68.170.0.238) - Jersyko talk 15:28, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as soon as possible. Aecis 14:17, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete sheer vanity. Karia 18:05, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.