User talk:Thseamon

Hello, I need your help! Please read the entry for Mary Ellis of New Brunswick and if you find it relevant, please vote for not deleting it. I think only New Jersey people would be interested in saving it. Although a small article the research took almost 6 hours if I include the ancillary biographies --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 04:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Thseamon, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. MB 20:52 May 13, 2003 (UTC)

Hi. When you create a page, don't repeat the page title (eg on Leadership development. cheers. -- Tarquin 20:28 14 May 2003 (UTC)

Hi, your articles regarding organizational subjects are very valuable. They would be even more useful if you somehow tie them together. The easiest way of doing it, is by adding something like: In sociology... (or organizational theory, or something) at the start of each article. See for example the directory article. Maybe even have a separate "list of XXX terms" article. Yaronf 23:02 16 May 2003 (UTC)

Thank you, Yaron. As someone who is brand new to the wild world of wikiwiki, all of your comments (as well as Tarquin's!) are much appreciated.

The business and economics forum

Anouncing the introduction of The Business and Economics Forum. It is a "place" where those of us with an interest in the business and economics section of Wikipedia can "meet" and discuss issues. Please drop by: the more contributors, the greater its usefulness. If you know of other Wikipedians who might be interested, please send this to them.

mydogategodshat 19:12, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Intrapersonal communication article help

Hello, I noticed that you started the Intrapersonal communication article and wondered if you'd like to perhaps help me fix it up somehow. I've got an MA in Linguistics and Philosophy and find it challenging so I think a lot of people may be a bit lost when reading it, regardless of how interesting the points and subject are. I'll try and make some of the parts clearer over the next few days but if you want to help out it would be very useful. Please also tell me if I've done anything wrong with it. Thanks in advance. Jellypuzzle 13:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jellypuzzle. I like what you (or someone) has been doing at this article. I'll see if there is anything else that occurs to me to contribute. User:Thseamon January 17, 2006

project invite

Hi Thseamon, I'm messaging you because I see that helped write the Organization development article. I'm recruitng OrgDev talent for a mini-project Wikipedia:WikiProject Fast OrgDev Advisory on Userpages, which will write an advisory document in support of the new Wikipedia:Proposed policy on userboxes. If you wanted to take a quick look at the project page you'd be most welcome. Herostratus 07:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Herostratus. Yes, I'd be happy to help. Let me know what you want to do next. User:Thseamon January 17, 2006

Communication planning

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Communication planning, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clicketyclack 16:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Principled Negotiation

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Principled Negotiation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Accounting4Taste 17:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DACUM

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article DACUM, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 14:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Upward feedback

An article that you have been involved in editing, Upward feedback, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upward feedback. Thank you. Torc2 (talk) 22:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Thseamon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 80 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Fons Trompenaars - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meeting

The article Meeting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The topic of this article is so broad and undifferentiated that the article as it stands is about as good as we can expect it to be: a solid definition followed by unsourced examples. While there exists an impressive body of reliable sources describing the conduct of specific classes of meetings, and a much larger body of work on how one can improve the efficiency of another subclass of meetings, what I'm not seeing is a reliable source that discusses meetings qua meetings. The topic could work as a category (holding Awayday, Kickoff meeting, etc.) and I could see an article on Meeting effectiveness (with literature going back at least to 1867), but I'm just not seeing this as a standalone article. I'm happy to discuss this further on the talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cardiovascular pathology

The article Cardiovascular pathology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meeting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meeting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Λυδ α cιτγ 04:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of modern channelled texts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of modern channelled texts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of modern channelled texts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mutual gains bargaining

The article Mutual gains bargaining has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No refs, no evidence of meeting WP:N, even after 12 years in CAT:NN's backlog. I couldn't establish it is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Real-time large-scale change

The article Real-time large-scale change has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DICDEF unsourced since its creation in 2003.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Systems thinking

The article Systems thinking has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:SYNTH, this is a generic term, the only citation supporting the existence of this concept is a random government civil service exam study guide.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - car chasm (talk) 00:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Systems thinking for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Systems thinking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Systems thinking until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- car chasm (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]