Talk:Prusik knot
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Prusik Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Prusik |
Untitled
[edit]Note: the image currently illustrating this article lacks information on the source and copyright status. If anyone has this information, please add it to the image page. Image may otherwise be deleted after 30 days; see WP:PUI listing. A replacement image which is public domain or licenced under GFDL would be appreciated. See Wikipedia:Images and related pages linked there for more information on Wikipedia image use policies and practices. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 20:45, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
New images will be uploaded asap! Stewart Adcock 09:39, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Inaccuracy?
[edit]At the bottom of the Prusik knot page, it says:
"The Klemheist tends to be easier to slide up, but does not work well with webbing"
Everything I've read suggests the opposite, that Prusik works best with cord and Klemheist works best with webbing.
See:
- Klemheist knot
- http://www.chockstone.org/TechTips/prusik.htm
- http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/7944/knots.htm
- http://www.gunks.com/index.php?pageid=108&pagenum=3&smGroup=2&smID=4
- http://guidetricksforclimbers.com/appendix.html
What do others think? --Rblack 03:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Maybe this was a typo, and was meant to read that the prusik does not work well with webbing? --AComrade 13:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I went ahead and changed it. --AComrade 21:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
The illustrations, however, show a prusik tied with webbing. This, as others have pointed out, is generally not considered safe because it may not hold. (Freedom of the Hills, 6th ed., page 121.) If I catch a wild hare at some point, I will make new images with accessory cord. Andyrew609 07:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)