Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep.
Originated by User:Chan Han Xiang.
- Keep I don't even understand why this is up for deletion. Spinboy 05:17, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Regardless, you shouldn't remove the vfd notice. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 06:50, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Putting up vfd notices are completely ridiculous. Ridiculous for hospitals at all. , even Medical Specialist Centre.User:Chan Han Xiang
- Ridiculuous? Then why the #*&@ did YOU put in the vfd notice? Speedy NON-deletion, if there is such a thing. --Calton 16:07, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Please note that User:Chan Han Xiang is abusing the VfD process here in retaliation for someone else listing Medical Specialist Centre for deletion. I added this to wp:vfd, as it had been orphaned. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:45, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Please note that User:Chan Han Xiang edited out my previous comment. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:49, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. My MWOT suggestion is that if a facetious and orphaned VfD notice is put on an article, then after a suitable period of time (I'd suggest an hour) the VfD notice can simply be removed as vandalism, rather than completing the process by listing the article on VfD. There is IMO no policy stopping this, and anyone can do it. But now it's easiest to let the process run its course. Andrewa 18:39, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Please note that User:Chan Han Xiang edited out my previous comment. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:49, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Itai 16:34, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. - SimonP 16:35, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Yay, more VfDcruft. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 16:50, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep one of the best-known hospitals in Canada. Samaritan 18:19, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Obviously. Although it could do with a bit of expansion. -- Necrothesp 18:37, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: "Medical Specialist Centre" was subliterate, misnamed, and established no notability of the thing at all. Its author is now peevishly VfD nominating things in revenge. The energy would be better spent putting his Medical Specialist Centre in idiomatic English, getting the notable facts in order, and moving it to a proper name. Geogre 21:43, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep but comment: I don't think it's here as revenge, it's more an attempt to make people agree that all hospitals are worthy of inclusion, not actually made with the intention of harming anyone. Kappa 22:59, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Article was nominated just to make a point not relevant specifically to the article in question. [[User:Livajo|力伟|☺]] 01:35, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Stubby, though, needs to be expanded. People shouldn't abuse Wikipedia processes to make points. Jayjg 05:47, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. In other news: December has recently been declared International Wikipedia Abuse Month. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 17:59, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I'm going to remove the VfD notice, and make note of the results in the talk page. Spinboy 08:37, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)