Talk:Awkward squad

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: National

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force

Untitled

Rix is no longer the leader of ASLEF by the way. Secretlondon 23:06, Feb 11, 2004 (UTC)

nor is Gilchrist head of the FBU. -- Arwel 00:04, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article: 1) doesn't cite any sources; and 2) phrases things in ways that would be inappropriate even if sources were cited (makes controversial claims directly through the article's voice, rather than attributing them and mentioning that they're controversial). In particular, the claims that New Labour doesn't stand up for workers' interests, and that New Labour is a continuation of Thatcherism, are both disputed, not least by New Labourites themselves. --Delirium 15:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anyone who honestly believes New Labour "stands up for workers' interests" -- New Labour types tend to be proven liars, so you won't find out what they believe by asking them. So, to judge people on their actions -- New Labour has not defended workers' rights, and the Labour party has never supported a strike when it has been in power; Private Finance Initiatives are pretty Thatcherite and New LAbour has not halted let alone reversed the wave of privatisations that took place under Tory rule; despite criticising the anti-union laws in opposition, it has not repealed them and does not support the campaign for a Trade Union Freedom Bill. Alan Johnson has said that some trade union leaders are from planet Zog (no, really he did!), Blair has said that there is no longer any conflict of interest between workers and employers (seriously, he said this!), and sought support from Rupert Murdoch who is fiercely anti-worker. The Party is now funded by millionaire businessmen -- he who pays the piper calls the tune, as the saying goes.

Yes, yes, but Delirium's point is that articles must always be presented from a neutral point of view and so should not say those types of things in an authorative voice - even if they are true. I've made some minor changes to rectify that, and I've removed the neutrality dispute notice. GrahamN 16:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Awkward squad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/quote_1861500864/Last_Words_Don%27t_let_the_awkward_squad_.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202061958/http://www.artofthestates.org:80/cgi-bin/piece.pl?pid=195 to http://artofthestates.org/cgi-bin/piece.pl?pid=195

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]