User talk:CyborgTosser

Proposed deletion of Chronic cellular dehydration

The article Chronic cellular dehydration has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has multiple issues that severely detract from the quality of the article which have not been fixed in two to seven years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EastonK (talk) 10:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar

More... • Learn how

Fix wikilinks

More... • Learn how

Update with new information

More... • Learn how

Expand short articles

More... • Learn how

Check and add references

More... • Learn how

Fix original research issues

More... • Learn how

Improve lead sections

More... • Learn how

Add an image

More... • Learn how

Translate and clean up

More... • Learn how

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 01:58, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

projector

Hello. When you create a new linear algebra article, could you add it to the list of linear algebra topics? Also, could you address the question I raised on the discussion page for projector (linear algebra). Michael Hardy 20:12, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Jack rock

Hello, CyborgTosser. Noticed your inclusion of "jack rock" as a synonym for caltrop. This puzzled me at first, as I haven't heard this term before, and couldn't find it in any of my dictionatires. Further, I was initially unable to find any Google references that didn't derive from the article. However, I did eventually find CODE OF ORDINANCES CITY OF WASHINGTON, ILLINOIS. These are cirty ordinances for a small town in Illinois. Thus, the term is possibly a local Illinois usage? At present the description makes it appear as if "jack rock" is a common or widely known synonym, which I don't believe is correct. I wondered if you had any additional information on the distribution of this usage so we could clarify the point? Securiger 01:36, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I found something here: [1] Not excatly the same thing, but along the same lines. I know it's not just a local Illinois thing. I didn't grow up in Illinois and it's the only word I've heard to describe such an item in modern usage. I don't know where I first heard it, but when I mention it to other people, they seem to know what I'm talking about. As a side note, I've always thought of "caltrop" having a military (and usually somewhat archaic) connotation, whereas "jack rock" describes something a criminal might put in the road to slow down police. CyborgTosser 06:35, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions

Here are some discussions to which I have contributed:

Talk:Ctype.h, Talk:Insider trading, Talk:Friction, Talk:Adverb, Talk:Chop Suey!, Talk:Americentrism, Talk:Religious pluralism, Talk:Significand, Talk:List of oxymora, Talk:Magnolia (movie), Talk:Cyclic group, Talk:TLAs from AAA to DZZ, Talk:Waltzing Matilda, Talk:Adverse selection, Talk:Theory of criminal justice, Talk:Retributive justice, Talk:Sense, Talk:Genetic basis for homosexuality, Talk:Restorative justice, Talk:Caltrop, Talk:Common logarithm, Talk:Nickel-cadmium battery, Talk:Cajun cuisine, Talk:Euphemism, Talk:Hypnosis, Talk:Cot-caught merger, Talk:American and British English differences, Talk:Causes of sexual orientation, Talk:Projection (linear algebra), Talk:Yars' Revenge, Talk:Capital punishment, Talk:Pet Shop Boys, Talk:Wedding band, Talk:Bounded linear function, Talk:Comparison of Java to C Plus Plus, Talk:Burrows-Wheeler transform, Talk:Java programming language, Talk:Checks and balances, Talk:Embrace and extend

Edit attributions

Hi. Edits from 198.37.26.168 have now been reattributed to you. Regards — Kate Turner | Talk 07:29, 2004 Sep 4 (UTC)

Thanks CyborgTosser 22:28, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Your username

In case you haven't been following the discussion, I just wanted to make you aware that apparently some people find your username disturbing, due to an implication of which you were probably not aware. To understand why, take a look at the discussion about your nomination on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. --Michael Snow 17:05, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

severity

severity *= 2;

would proabbly be faster as

severity <<= 2;

Oh wait, this is Java. Nevermind ;) -- orthogonal 11:12, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Well, it would be

severity <<= 1;

anyway. But compilers are smart enough to justify keeping the more readable

severity *= 2;

CyborgTosser 17:57, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Damn, you got me! Ouch. ;) -- orthogonal 18:14, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Sys-op nomination

I'm sorry to inform you that as there was no consensus on your becoming an administrator at the end of the one week voting period, I've had to remove your nomination. I hope you'll stand again when you have more edits, as that was the main objection given and I believe you would make an excellent administrator. Warofdreams 16:12, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Don't be too dissapointed, you missed it by only a narrow margin. When you feel the time is ripe to try again, drop me a note on my talk page and I'll nominate you myself. (unless you turn into a vandal or something in the meantime ;-) Theresa Knott (taketh no rest) 19:53, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I am disgusted at some of the reasons people gave to oppose your adminship. I encourage you to spend a month building up the "all-important" edit-count before reapplying. - Mark 12:35, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I am disappointed as well, but I suppose I shouldn't be too surprised. Just a few months ago, the guidelines on the nomination page said 500-1000 edits, but I guess that's not enough for some people. CyborgTosser 19:17, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Jimbo Visit

I will be at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 23 October, 2004, speaking at the ACM Reflections | Projections Conference 2004 -

This conference runs from 22. - 24. October 2004; it would be fantastic to have a Wikipedia booth, if I can get volunteers for it.

Do you think you could come? Jimbo Wales 16:23, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Admin nomination

If you want your nomination to go through, it might help to answer the "candidate questions" at the bottom, since non-response is being used against you. Very Verily 23:30, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I don't remember seeing this section of questions earlier and I think it was added fairly recently. [[User:CyborgTosser|CyborgTosser (Only half the battle)]] 00:12, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I see you've just been promoted to admin. Congratulations. Use your new powers very catiously. Nearly everything you do can be undone with the exception of deleting images. There's no undo for them. What's more the link table is corrupted and some images look like they are orphans when they are in fact used. So be really really waring of deleting an image. Let me know if you need any help with anything while you find your feet. Theresa Knott (Not the skater) 08:29, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

RFC pages on VfD

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:30, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It is my opinion that RFC pages are part of the history of the project that shouldn't be erased. They could prove useful in resolving further disputes with the user or similar disputes with other users. However, I don't really want to get involved in this as I haven't spent much time involved in RFC. [[User:CyborgTosser|CyborgTosser (Only half the battle)]] 21:41, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Image tag

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:Dynamic_logic_nand_gate.PNG

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status?

You can use {{gfdl}} if you release your own work under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{PD-self}} if you wish to release your own work to the public domain, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, and so on. Click here for a list of the various tags.

If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the image from, and I'll tag it for you. Thanks so much. Denni ☯ 04:23, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at Wikipedia:Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

thank you

Thank you for contributing so much to wikipedia.

I see some inconsistency between the mechanical equilibrium and the metastability articles, and I hope you could help me fix it.

I would tend to say that the

Second derivative < 0
Second derivative = 0

cases are *both* metastable, and the third case

Second derivative > 0

is stable.

However, my intuition is exactly the reverse of the mechanical equilibrium article.

The metastability article seems to say that *none* of these three cases qualify as metastable.

--DavidCary 03:23, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Retributive justice

In reference to the retributive justice article, do you have any more details about "the recent practical failings of restorative justice"? I am writing an article on restorative justice that will include 2001 stats from Department of Justice Canada showing restorative justice has lower recidivism than retributive justice[2]^{[permanent dead link]}. Most of the data I have found (such as studies by University of Minnesota professor Mark Umbreit) show that restoration has better rates of victim and offender satisfaction as well. I will copy this message to the retributive justice talk page. — Nathanlarson32767 (Talk) 19:34, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Consonant articles

Feel free to plunge in and improve them in whatever way you see fit. In particular, a standardized way of dealing with examples is sorely needed. And by "standardized", I fully intend for English examples to be treated differently from other languages,this being the English Wikipedia and all. Best of luck to you. Nohat 06:49, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Palatal nasal

I am reorganizing the sections on language examples in each of the consonant articles (trying to make them all fit the same format), and I noticed the English language example, canyon, you added on palatal nasal. Is that an Australian pronunciation? I'm not sure I've ever heard it pronounced that way (by the way, I'm from the US). I just wanted to make sure before I move things around. Thanks. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 10:18, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

That surprises me, because I watch American programs on TV (there are alot on our TV channels) and to me that's how Americans pronounce canyon, just as we do here in Australia. This is definitely a correct pronunciation (if not for North Americans) from both Australian & British dictionaries that I have. If your confused about the two different pronunciations, one is the broad transcription (between the slashes) and the other is the narrow transcription (between the square brackets). Could you give me an example of how Americans pronounce canyon from a dictionary using IPA? -- Kind regards, AxSkov 14:29, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The changes you have made to palatal nasal are fine, but I should clarify something. The dictionaries I have, use the [nj] sequence for canyon in general, but they also say that the:

[ç] sound is similar to the first sound in huge, that is the [hj] sequence.
[ɲ] sound is an allophone of the [nj] sequence used in English, in words such as onion, canyon, etc.
- If you say onion or canyon (with the primary stress on [k]) fast, you should get a sound very similar to [ɲ].
[ʎ] sound is an allophone of the [lj] sequence used in English, in words such as million, etc.

Do you mind if I restructure the sentence to say something like this:

In some dialects of English, the [nj] sequence is an allophone of the palatal nasal, as in onion (/ˈʌnjən/ or [ˈʌɲən]) or canyon (/ˈkænjən/ or [ˈkæɲən]).

-- Regards, AxSkov 05:06, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee case opening

The case against JarlaxleArtemis has been accepted by the Arbitration Committee. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/JarlaxleArtemis/Evidence. Thank you. -- Grun t 🇪🇺 16:26, 2005 Mar 3 (UTC)

wrong information in article

hi, i'm from the german wikipedia and there occured the same mistake like here with the german de:Ach-Laut. it's not a voiceless velar fricative, but a voiceless uvular fricative. i saw that you gave the information in Voiceless velar fricative and so i want you to correct it, please. not only this article, there are some other more. thanks, joni --213.209.67.141 22:39, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Haben Sie ein Hinweis über Ach-Laut mit IPA (auf Englisch oder Deutsch)? Ich finde deise Seite, die sagt Ach-Laut ist wie "ch" in scottisch "loch", also [x]. Auch, UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database sagt Deutsch hat voiceless velar fricative. Danke, CyborgTosser.

i've found one:

on http://www.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de/~ifb/sw/ipa/ipauebersicht2.html you can find the following:

stimmhafter velarer Frikativ:

<hoch> [hox] süddt.Variaton (="dialect of people in the south of germany", not the standard [they speak very strange :P])

<Acht> [ˈaxt] süddt.Variation (="dialect of people in the south of germany", not the standard)

stimmloser uvularer Frikativ:

<Drachen> [ˈdʁa;χn̩]

----

"uvular" means "at the suppository/uvula/small plug" (whatever you understand, i don't know the right word, i mean the thing in the back of the mouth that hangs there like a drop) and if i speak a "ch" like in "auch", "machen" and "Bauch", i feel that this drop is in motion

thanks, joni --213.209.69.4 09:10, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee ruling

The case against JarlaxleArtemis has closed. Please read the final decision for details. -- Grun t 🇪🇺 23:07, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)

A moderating force could be of use

At RfC I listed:

Talk:Rikssvenska, Talk:Swedish language, Talk:Swedish phonology, Talk:Voiceless dorso-palatal velar fricative, and most probably soon in more related articles, souring relations between contributors with conflicting attitudes and personalities (likely related, among other things, to the status of Finland-Swedish and the Mandatory Swedish education in Finland).

Maybe this is a field where you can weight in as a moderating force.

Regards!
--Johan Magnus 09:59, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

DYK

Did you know has been updated

and a fact from the article fire escape, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you have another interesting fact to submit, then please suggest it at the section's talk page.

Sprinkles

I've been wanting to add to your lovely Sprinkles article for weeks, but since I'm pretty new here, and have only added to stubs, I thought it would be better-mannered to let you know in advance. A heads-down, in this case, to avoid nonpareils in the eye. I hope this meets with your approval.

fan of sprinkles, Mothperson 22:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a few ideas. I can't tell you precisely why, but this article is near the top of my top ten list of favorite Wikipedia articles. Don't let that worry you, though. I am not a nut. Okay, I am, but I am an educated nut with a good background in sugar. Thank you. --Mothperson 02:07, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"parking structure"

Hello. You edits to parking cause me to wonder if you're from (a) California, or (b) elsewhere on the West Coast, or (c) somewhere else. Is "parking structure" a term you're accustomed to using, other than when you edit here? Michael Hardy 19:47, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Da kine

Okay, I saw your request. I'll look at your article this weekend. ManoaChild 20:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks pretty good to me. I can't think of an example to add. Most of the examples that I can think of are trivial. The more interesting examples simply don't make sense when written, because the meaning is in the way that the word is emphisized. There may be something there: when "da kine" is used as an adjective or adverb, a lot of the time it doesn't add any meaning, but it acts as a word that can be emphisized, and it is the added emphisis that carries the meaning. ManoaChild 22:11, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Water ionizer

Hi CyborgTosser, I'm not sure if you are aware, but there seems to be some "issues" at water ionizer. I thought since you are an admin, and have also shown interest in the article on the talk page, that you may be able to help. I originally RVed several edits from 84.92.207.141 that I suspected were made with a commercial interest in mind, but this seems to have escalated into an edit war. I am no longer sure that commercial interests are at the front, but the user appears adamant about the subject. There is some discussion on the talk page. I am not sure if I am being either too harsh or too lenient in my discussions, so I would appreciate any input. Thanks! -postglock 01:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Two hands on the steering wheel"

There is no article by this name, but there probaly should be. Anyway, see this page. 203.214.4.49Febuary 2006

Image:Bring radicals cartoon.PNG up for deletion

Image:Bring radicals cartoon.PNG has been listed for deletion: see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. -℘yrop (talk) 00:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dynamic_logic_nand_gate.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dynamic_logic_nand_gate.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ::mikm t 03:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Style guidelines for sound pages

Nobody seems to be touching the discussion on our style guidelines. I've messaged a few people on the WikiProject phonetics members list just to get someone else to approve or discuss it. Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 06:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seals on legal instruments

Thanks for the message! I am sadly swamped with reading and don't have any time to put into pleasure reading, even for Wikipedia. I would be more than willing, though, to help craft an article with my academic access to things like Lexis and a well-stocked law library. This is certainly an interesting topic, and a class I am presently taking, "Advanced Contract Theory Seminar," led me to a few interesting claims, including one made in the 70s by Grant Gilmore in his book "The Death of Contract" (among other places coming from other authors).

The idea is that consideration is a load of hooey that was invented sometime in the late 19th century to explain contract law as it had already developed by that point. It seems to me to follow that, as the seal is much older than such discussions of consideration, it could be that using a seal as a substitute for consideration was only a late 19th century explanation and, in reality, the seal itself existed to make agreements binding for a long time before the word "consideration" ever entered a court's opinion.

I don't know much about the reality of this, but I do remain fascinated by the history of it. Hopefully we can put something together that explains all this without falling afoul of the rules about original research. Ari 04:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I'll be sure to watch your progress. Maybe I can follow some leads and figure things out. One of the books on my post-bar-exam "pleasure" reading list is a history of contract law that I haven't bought yet but hope contains more information on all this. Ari 19:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Czech Wikipedian's notice board

You are invited to join Wikipedia:Czech Wikipedian's notice board! The Czech notice board can be used for discussions on Czech-related topics; to plan your Czech-related projects; and ask for, or offer assistance for Czech-related subjects. Editors are encouraged to sign their nickname on the list of active participators. --Thus Spake Anittas 02:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Loves Mangos

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Bobby Loves Mangos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.132.19.76 18:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionII.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionII.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionI.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionI.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nausicaan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nausicaan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nausicaan. Ejfetters 06:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nausicaan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nausicaan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nausicaan. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PetShopBoysPopArt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PetShopBoysPopArt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Religion in Futurama

An editor has nominated Religion in Futurama, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion in Futurama and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Da kine

A tag has been placed on Da kine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Cheers, Glacier Wolf 17:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GunsnRosesUseYourIllusionII.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 03:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Counterpunch (book)

I have nominated Counterpunch (book), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counterpunch (book). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 09:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livestock brand T S connected.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Livestock brand T S connected.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livestock brand lazy 5.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Livestock brand lazy 5.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livestock brand reverse K.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Livestock brand reverse K.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sandwiches That You Will Like

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sandwiches That You Will Like, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no thrid party sourcing indicating this special is at all notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

prod Pie method

I have proposed Pie method which you set up for deletion. Dmcq (talk) 23:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NEW CATEGORY PAGE

Hello Washington-user!! What do you think of this category?
Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary.
Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 10:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Traveller-in-Tacoma (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of Puya (band)

The article Puya (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-established article but has never made any case to promote notability. Provides citations, no outside resources and provides no information or insight beyond what is readily available on official group website and press releases. Suggest reading of WP:GARAGE and WP:BAND for common problems in these articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Datheisen (talk) 03:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Happy Nebula Adventures

The article Happy Nebula Adventures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company total of 25 hits [3]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 12:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Revelation (role-playing game)

The article Revelation (role-playing game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable RPG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetSopBoysIntrospective.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetSopBoysIntrospective.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetShopBoysBilingual.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetShopBoysBilingual.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mister Smile

The article Mister Smile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetShopBoysNightlife.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetShopBoysNightlife.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black XXX-Mas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black XXX-Mas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black XXX-Mas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Genetic disorders has been nominated for discussion

Category:Genetic disorders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chronic cellular dehydration for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chronic cellular dehydration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronic cellular dehydration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Paleo Neonate - 06:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Accounting method for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Accounting method is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accounting method until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ï¿½ (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetShopBoysVery.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetShopBoysVery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetShopBoysVeryRelentless.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetShopBoysVeryRelentless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shocking Tanks

The article Shocking Tanks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of passing WP:NPRODUCT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thri-kreen

The article Thri-kreen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spooky Zoo Spectacular

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spooky Zoo Spectacular requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetShopBoysDisco3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetShopBoysDisco3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetShopBoysDisco2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetShopBoysDisco2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Po Mo Knock Knock

The article Po Mo Knock Knock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except other wikis and notices of being shown at film festivals. Tagged for notability since 2018.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miranda Silvergren

The article Miranda Silvergren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to identify any coverage of her work to meet entertainer or GNG. Other language articles simply include the same non source as this one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 15:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetShopBoysActually.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetShopBoysActually.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Technomancy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technomancy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technomancy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amazing Rain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amazing Rain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazing Rain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]