Talk:Millennium Bridge, London

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Millennium Bridge, London article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

Retrofitted Dampers

User:Solipsist found this paper on the dampers retrofitted to the bridge. --Tagishsimon (talk) retrofitted dampers were fitted in and work completed in 2002, however i visited the bridge in 2009 and photographed evidence of missing bolts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.140.22 (talk) 12:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant Image

I think that second image of the bridge is redundant. It's basically the same one as the first image, except reversed and in color-- and that first image already been cited at a Wikipedia picture of the day. Any objections to removing the second image? TheCoffee 10:16, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for being thoughtful and asking before you did anything. Yes, I would definitely object to its removal. If you click on each pic and read the info there, you will see that the colour pic is public domain but the black and white pic is copyrighted. Wikipedia dislikes copyrighted stuff so it would be crazy to remove a PD pic in favour of a copyrighted pic. In any case. any reader wanting to use a Millennium Bridge pic in homework or in a project would surely use the colour pic! - Adrian Pingstone

Actually, I think that if Wikipedia has a preference at all, it prefers copyrighted and appropriately licensed (preferably with the GFDL) pictures to ones in the public domain. The black and white image here is licensed with a Creative Common open licence, which is different to GFDL but with very similar objectives. However I do agree that the fact one picture is color and the other b&w is enough of a difference to retain both. -- Chris j wood 22:02, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image layout

Well I agree that the previous image layout had become untidy, but I'm not sure the two column table works that well. I would suggest going with a largish version of Image:London_millenium_wobbly_bridge.jpg as the lead picture since it is a Featured Picture, put one other image down the right hand side (probably of people on the bridge), then a horizontal row of three just above the External Links section. -- Solipsist 3 July 2005 12:04 (UTC)

Ownership

Bridge House Estates is the actual owner of the bridge, and fund all repairs and maintenance - no 'ratepayers money' is used for this. There is a real and legal difference between the trust and its trustee, although the Corporation of London has sometimes blurred the boundary in its representations.

Mauls 21:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How quickly was it shut?

Shortly after it opened, on the same day, the bridge was closed to the public. Ronstew (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images of the bridge

I have five images of the Millennium bridge which you may wish to consider for this page. At present, none of them are suitably licensed for Wikipedia nor Wikimedia. If you want one or more of these images for this page, let me know on my talk page --Senra (talk) 22:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the Media

Sentence #1: "...the Millennium Bridge replaces the Brockdale Bridge...."

Sentence #2: "The Millennium Bridge does not, however, replace the Brockdale Bridge...."

If anyone knows how this should read, please revise!Jedwards01 (talk) 05:06, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Mirror

The bridge appears in an episode of Charlie Brookers Black Mirror (Channel 4) where a member of the royal family is left on it after being kidnapped. This could be added to the pop culture section but I don't have a good enough reference for it. Javindo (talk) 21:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wobbly or bendy?

I thought (and various Google results when searching 'bendy bridge london' support me) that this was colloquially known as the bendy brideAdagio67 (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

when it first opened the name was used, but it's not something that you'd hear used nowadays, it's not been 'bendy' for 15 years... Paulbrock (talk) 13:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Popular Culture

If we can find a source for it, we should note that it played a notable role in the premier episode of the series The Black Mirror. SecretName101 (talk) 03:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Millennium Bridge, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Millennium Bridge, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091030004102/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23761203-second-wobbly-bridge-for-london.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23761203-second-wobbly-bridge-for-london.do

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Millennium Bridge

It is a bridge in london above the river thames 81.103.131.227 (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]