Talk:Riparian Plaza

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Riparian Plaza is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite

I've made a significant rewrite of the article - the original was rather chaotic, and seemed somewhat less than neutral, with a number of emotive adjectives used. Nick Moss 23:06, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Photo

With that great photo added, the other two were no longer necessary and were making the article too long, so I deleted the links.Iorek85 23:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number of elevators

I can't find a reference for the number of elevators for the infobox. If you know the number, please add it, or if you have a source, let us know. - Shiftchange (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying we can use this as a source, as I'm constantly removing skyscrapercity forum links from references on articles, but [http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=799658&postcount=592 this post] appears to say it has 8 elevators in total. That doesn't seem like many to me, seeing as most skyscrapers of this height have at least 15-20, that I know of anyway. --timsdad ^(talk) 07:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have the building plans for Riparian PLaza. It has thirteen lifts in total. They comprise 6x Low rise lifts, 4x High Rise Lifts and 2x Residential lifts. These are all 23 passange cars. There is also 1x Goods lift rated at 2,500kg. There are also 2x carpark lifts however these would not normally be included in the count as they are outside of the core. MyFavco (talk) 03:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed Facts

Timsdad has edited this page so that the Developer is incorrectly listed as Grocon. I have reverted this edit. This simple and obvious fact can be verified with the smallest amount of Research. -MyFavco (talk) 02:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was that comment even worth starting a discussion about? It's clearly not disputed, I mistakenly reverted more of your edit than I meant to, and for that I am sorry. --timsdad ^(talk) 06:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I aplogise for the tone of my comment above, it was little harsh. However, at the time I was rather perplexed that my correction of such an obvious error was reverted so quickly. I can see now how it happened. It is good to see that we have since built upon each others comments to jointly further improve other related pages.MyFavco (talk) 11:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mast is now counted in height

In keeping with the articles for

Central Park (skyscraper), (perth), 120 Collins Street, (melb), 101 Collins Street, (melb), Bourke Place, (melb) --- communications spires are now included in height of Australian buildings.

(official riparian website also quotes 250m)

communications masts now count as spires if they double as an integral part of the buildings design.

If this is so for buildings like central park perth, and bourke place, it is certainly the central design point for riparian.

http://www.riparianplaza.com.au/Core/Content/AConceptualFirst/Content1254.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saruman-the-white (talk • contribs) 08:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the spires on rialto towers, and melbourne central tower which are communications masts now also count in height (see list of talles buildings in australia). we will follow this for consistancy.

Saruman-the-white (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Riparian Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]