User talk:Rosemaryamey

Older messages

2004-2006

Carnism

Thank you so much for fixing the page on carnism, what happened is an outrage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.35.68 (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rosemaryamey, it's Jared from facebook. How do we proceed to fight the flags on "carnism"? I wrote some comments on the TALK page, but I don't think it's very effective. Care to guide me through the process? Symphanticade (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!!!

Thanks for your help with the Growth attenuation page. I really appreciate it. Remember 20:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aquinas College, Perth Notable Alumni

Hey, apologies if you didnt notice and for me being not so wiki-literate. But i just moved all of that information from List of Aquinas College, Perth Notable Alumnii to List of Aquinas College, Perth Notable Alumni in order to change the name of the article - as you may notice the first instance alumni is spelt wrong (double use of the letter i) - so infact it is not vandalism. Apologies if this seems a tad harsh - but the way you deal with others is a bit brash and it may come off as a bit harsh - just a warning - nothing personal. i know you have good intentions - thanks Smbarnzy 17:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi to Smbarnzy and Rosemaryamey,

I have been following your actions on List of Aquinas College, Perth Notable Alumnii ( note spelling ! ) with interest. There's been a little confusion here, so what I've done is this: 1. I've restored the article, reverting the blanking of the page by Smbarnzy. 2. I've tagged the article for Speedy Deletion on "housekeeping" grounds ( that is, that the article title is incorrectly spelt, and that the article simply duplicates content held elsewhere ). I feel that Smbarnzy was unwise to blank the page: a "deletion" approach probably works better, as it doesn't leave blank pages lying around. I also feel that both Smbarnzy and Rosemaryamey have been a little intemperate over this one: I hope you will both be able to "assume good faith": as an outside observer it's easy to see that both of you are doing a great job.

With best regards to both of you,

WMMartin 19:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bloodworm

See http://theaquariumwiki.com/Bloodworm

Lots of frog owners feed their Aquatic frogs one food item. Ask any Vet if this is a good thing for any animal and the answer will be no.

People can develop allegies to Bloodworm and its liquid. Not nice I got it after handing BW after 2 years!

Bloodworm has hardly any protein in it. It's attractive to animal because of its smell. Lots of alternatives you can use. See http://theaquariumwiki.com/DAF

--Quatermass 22:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pietra Brewery Corrections

Hi. I would just like to say a big thanks for correcting some grammar mistakes in the article I translated on the Pietra brewery and for removing the unecessary bits. I generally just do a straightforward translation of articles on wikipedia and prefer to leave it to others to deal with the content itself! Thanks anyway, Jono 22:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request for comments

Hi. I must admit that I am puzzled with your message. Am I involved in a dispute regarding this article? I must admit I am not familiar with the subject at all so I will refrain from commenting. -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

I saw your reversion of my edit on the Schiavo article; I don't understand your logic here: Terri Schiavo's main claim to fame was the feeding tube. ??...

Also, I would ask you make an argument on the talk page if you think strongly about this; you may pick up a majority of votes, in which case I would feel better here that analysis was done in a logical manner. In your favor, I note that the current version is grammatically ok and not hard to understand.

Lastly, I saw your support for veganism. If you wish to support this alternative, you might benefit from the deep research I've done on that matter at one of my several mirrors. In short, there are not only #1 health benefits, but also #2 economical benefits, and of course #3 veganism supports animal rights (but did you know that a religious cite even supports animal rights? Yes: See e.g., Proverbs 12:10 ) -lastly, #4: Vegan foods taste better, but this is subjective.

Cites:

"A righteous man regards the life of his animal..." [1]
http://GordonWayneWatts.com/consumer.html
http://GordonWatts.com/consumer.html

At the Consumer Advisory webpages, I show scientific research in which vegan diets are better -I cover, apparently, all the bases. Here are the other mirrors -but each mirror is basically identical, so a visitor need only visit one page:

Live long, and prosper, --GordonWatts 02:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

substing

When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

This was from your comments on User talk:Wheatthins34 regarding Hey Arnold!. Oh, and by the way, there are bunch of new user talk templates you can use if you like. Thanks for your anti-vandalism work. MKoltnow 19:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)\\[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Waldorf_education/Review

Pursuant to Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Waldorf_education#Waldorf_education_and_related_articles_placed_on_probation I have initiated a review of the behavior of the editors of Waldorf education at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Waldorf_education/Review. This review will consider appropriate editing restrictions on editors of the article. Fred Bauder 02:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latasha Harlins

May I ask you why you moved "Shooting of Latasha Harlins" to "Latasha Harlins"? Mwelch 20:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at User talk:Mwelch. Rosemary Amey 22:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I should probably look at other child murder cases to get a better feel. I note those two specific examples at least do *some* discussion of the lives of people outside of the death. On the Harlins page, there really is nothing about either Harlins' or Du's life outside of this incident. And since it occurred 15 years ago, I doubt there is any new public information that will come to ever allow the article to be expanded beyond what it is now into the lives of either of them. As is indicated on the Latasha Harlins talk page, that that was the very reason for moving it to a new title in the first place. Mwelch 22:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Carroll (musician)

I moved Liz Carroll, musician to Liz Carroll (musician), since that's the standard format. Just wanted to give you a heads-up. Leebo⁸⁶ 23:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

introduction

Hi, I'm a disabled vegtarian mother living with chronic pain as well. I just wanted to drop a note. I am also very interested in the articles you have listed but not written. I hope to see those finished.

Peace Ara Pelodi 19:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ashley2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Carroll, accused of murder

An editor has nominated David Carroll, accused of murder, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Carroll, accused of murder and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 10:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zoophilia/bestiality

I think you may have misunderstood the forking issue. The long term article is at Zoophilia. A few months back there was an attempt to fork some of it to Bestiality but this was agreed to be inappropriate after discussion, and reversed. Hope that helps. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 22:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

input sought

In a message to several recent editors of Schiavo-related pages, I write that: Input is sought here: Talk:Government_involvement_in_the_Terri_Schiavo_case#Edit_War_between_me_and_User:Calton.

--GordonWatts 15:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Fiesel

Hey, to let you know so that you can update the article. Marcus Fiesel's mother was found guilty of all charges. This was a very, very short trial. Maybe a week? Here's a link [2]. -- Sapphire 03:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, David Carroll took a plea deal. He's going to plead guilty and will have to serve at least sixteen years in prison, however, he may also never get out... Anywho, the deal isn't official since a judge has to sign off on it. Cincinnati Enquirer story: [3]. -- Sapphire 03:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2009

Support TORONTO in its bid to become the host city of WIKIMANIA 2009 The University of Toronto is the planned host site, which I see is your alma-mater! Visit m:Wikimania 2009/Toronto for TORONTO's MetaWiki page and help build a strong bid.
Toronto Candidate City for Wikimania 2009

-- Zanimum 16:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...

--nat ^{Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?!} 23:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Arthur Schafer

I have nominated Arthur Schafer, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Schafer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Lawrence § t/e 22:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Marcus2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Marcus2006.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 00:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Love your input on a new disability access wiki

Hi there,

I stumbled on your user page and I thought I'd drop you a line. I've recently launched a not for profit website that I hope might be useful to the disability community. It's a worldwide disability access wiki/map called [AccessibilityMapr.com].

Given that you appear to be both an experienced Wikipedian and someone interested in disability issues, I was wondering if you could give me any feedback on the site. Do you like the concept? How can I best attract users do yo think?

Cheers

Markbrown00 (talk) 23:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toronto Environmental Coalition

The article Toronto Environmental Coalition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indications of notability at all; no sources to sustain what's stated here; what's stated here is also Not neutral

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. L.tak (talk) 18:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ashley2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ashley2006.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rosemaryamey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rosemaryamey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rachel Capra Craig for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Capra Craig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Capra Craig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tera TIX 13:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosemaryamey:

Thank you for your contributions to veganism – or vegetarianism – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a WikiProject to improve veganism and vegetarianism articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics.

If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Not Dead Yet (nonprofit) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Not Dead Yet (nonprofit) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not Dead Yet (nonprofit) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SecretName101 (talk) 20:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]