Talk:Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mass surveillance Low‑importance

	Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

What is it?

Can you please tell us what it is before jumping down our throats to tell us it's the worst thing in the world. Thank you. --Dtcdthingy 14:41, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

delete

this is horribly written propoganda. there is no objective article here.

Do Not Delete

This is not propaganda. Although it is certainly not neutral, I work in law enforcement and can state unequivocally that the program is what the article says, except it is not a terminated pilot project - it is being implemented as a fully functional antiterrorism program. I believe it was re-funded through 'other channels' (NSA, but could be any intelligence agency with a black budget), which would account for its quiet resurrection. In light of recent events concerning the strengthening of national intelligence capabilities, the history of TIA (DARPA's IAO) and the general conversion of America into a fishbowl where we can all be watched closely, this article should not be deleted. It should be retained.

Don't understand the dispute?

This project has been shut down since June 2005. This page needs to be updated http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-205261

Maybe the article has been updated since the comments were made, but one "commenter" says it's not an objective article, another says it does not describe the MATRIX system. The current article seems to describe the system objectively.

It would seem to me that posters should be more specific and/or offer their own versions before they get to put a "disputed" flag on an informative and objective article.

real fears, or bogus?

I for one think more information about possible government information gathering systmes is needed. Oh, sure, it's propoganda (sic) . . .

I would rather be paranoid (about the most powerful military-industrial complex driven nation in the world committing crimes against its own citizens and Constitution), and wrong, than to be Polly Anna, and be wrong.

"It can't happen here!" has been stated about a number of things that were seen in totalitarian governments, such as Czarist AND Soviet Russia, yet those VERY things HAVE happened here . . . political concentration camps (the Japanese in WWII), the curtailment of free speech (Alien and Sedition Act), the McCarthy show trials . . . Joe the Plumber US citizen from summer/fall 2008 presidental election campaign who was subjected to IRS, FBI and other federal and state governmental agency investigation when he (Joe) said things that the Democratic canditate's platform disagreed with.

Neutrality

I would suggest that the article begin with a statement about what The Matrix is, before the "controversial" aspects of it are discussed. The article begins:

"The Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange Program, also known by the acronym "MATRIX" (Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange), has recently come under scrutiny by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). ("Why We Should Fear The Matrix".) "

The statement

"What does the Matrix do? According to Congressional testimony and news reports, it appears to do just what TIA would have done, if enacted: Tie together government and commercial databases in order to allow federal and state law enforcement entities to conduct detailed searches on particular individuals' dossiers."

does not appear until 6-7 paragraphs later. Even the wording of the descriptive sentence, beginning with "it appears to do just what the TIA would have done," implies that the TIA (whatever it actually was) would have been undesirable, had it been enacted (particularly since the sentence was preceeded by anti-Matrix statements). So the first thing the reader sees is that the ACLU is strongly opposed to the use of the Matrix. Moreover, no rebuttal to the ACLU complaints is provided; indeed, no mention is made of the possible reasons one might support The Matrix.

The "What the Matrix is" section appears to be a somewhat sarcastic treatment of the subject from an anti-Matrix advocate, discussing the concept of "anomaly" as if it were a euphemism invented by pro-Matrix advocates. Indeed, scrutiny reveals most of the article was taken verbatim from the article "Why We Should Fear The Matrix," cited near the beginning of the article. Is it neutral to write a "What ____ is" section by copying an article titled "Why We Should Fear ____?" I think not. There are news articles and other sources (other than opinion pages) that deal with the subject of The Matrix.

I agree with the marking of this article as non-neutral; it needs significant work. [unsigned comment]

Well, I recommend that you take the initiative and be bold. 24.18.35.120 03:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]