Talk:L'Oréal

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on L'Oréal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150502221904/http://www.trustadvisory.info/allindia_2014.html to http://www.trustadvisory.info/allindia_2014.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20100424192639/http%3A//www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/anitas-163652m-sellout-470379.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on L'Oréal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120505045702/http://gladwell.com/2011/2011_03_28_a_color_of_money.html to http://www.gladwell.com/2011/2011_03_28_a_color_of_money.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141010122943/http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D14633%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html to http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D14633%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160403113833/http://standardethicsindices.eu/standard-ethics-french-index.html to http://www.standardethicsindices.eu/standard-ethics-french-index.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20170209165431/http://www.connexionfrance.com/court-appeal-price-fixing-fine-upheld-consumer-companies-gillette-loreal-procter-gamble-sc-johnson-18567-view-article.html to http://www.connexionfrance.com/court-appeal-price-fixing-fine-upheld-consumer-companies-gillette-loreal-procter-gamble-sc-johnson-18567-view-article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

what's in a name?

what's the word L'oreal mean? I used to think Oreo, but that's probably wrong.Feldercarb (talk) 17:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Skin whitening detail

@Ya hemos pasao: Regarding the change: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%27Or%C3%A9al&type=revision&diff=964110165&oldid=963604713&diffmode=source firstly the change to "affirmed" adds bias as it is a strong word (meaning "emphatically state"), suggesting the extent of the company's feeling about the statement (which we do not know/cannot back up with a source). It is more accurate to say this was a claim by the company (something they are stating but cannot necessarily be backed up by a neutral observer). Secondly (and I think this would have been better as two separate changes) the changes to the skin whitening section remove essential context - you have said that the skin whitening creams have been criticised but removed a point about the reason for this criticism which was supported by a citation. Apologies but I took the liberty of undoing the change as you by deletion were undoing someone else's change. Evertent (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Undid here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%27Or%C3%A9al&diff=971218517&oldid=971212759&diffmode=source Evertent (talk) 20:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Paravision link appears to be incorrect

Currently links to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravisi%C3%B3n which is a television network in Paraguay and may have been created in 2005, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravisi%C3%B3n. I believe the article is talking about Paravision International, which is a different company that was created far earlier. I don't believe the company has an English or French page but it is referenced on this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StudioCanal and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Frydman. Link should probably just be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coystags (talk • contribs) 23:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)