Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contradick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Korath (Talk) 00:33, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
Another vanity neologism from the creator of The Membrane. —Korath (Talk) 04:33, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete I am not the creator of this word. It has been used elsewhere. If you paid any attention whatsoever to pop culture, this is not considered neologism considering it is used! Stop making such judgments so quickly and accept that you're not always right.
- This edit by 24.238.39.115
- Delete. Whether it is a neologism or not, it doesn't matter—Wikipedia is not a dictionary JeremyA 06:00, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete there are plenty of sites out there for slang terms Feco 06:49, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 08:21, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this is a neologism. -- Mgm|(talk) 09:37, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. If this is an actual word, it should be moved to wiktionary. I can find no evidence that it is an actual word, and absent any such evidence, suggest it be deleted. --Jacobw 16:00, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy deleted, non-notable neologism, creator of article admits they made up the word. -- Infrogmation 19:08, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.