Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Tresmond

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 20:47, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Max Tresmond

Vanity. Xezbeth 16:07, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Delete or merge with List of cult leaders named Max. "For the past for years," indeed. --Asriel86 16:41, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete it is clearly a vanity. --Anonymous Cow 17:30, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete lamer vanity. Fawcett5 16:57, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
User:MaxTresmond has made no other contributions at all, ruling out Userfy. Delete. Uncle G 17:44, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)

I wish to keep this page, as I have started a Logic Project. As I have been very busy, I am adding to this page as I get the chance. Please do not remove this page, as I believe I deserve a right to publish an article in regards to my area in the acedemic arena.

Actually, now that I think about it, the page should be deleted, and I will write an article one the project itself.

Delete. And, I would not recommend writing a Wikipedia article about your project either. Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research. FreplySpang (talk) 22:34, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete - I (--JimWae 22:48, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)) have already deleted his vanity insertions into

Delete - vanity -- Solipsist 01:20, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete Charles Matthews 15:50, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.