User talk:ElectraFlarefire

waves to all who wishes to talk/comment/insult* :)

Electro-stub

Hi ElectraFlarefire - Not an insult, more of a comment... I note you';ve created a new stub category. Did you realise that stub categories should normally be cleared by Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting before creation? That way they can be vetted to check that there are a viable number of stubs (at least 60-100) and that the category does not cross the existing stub hierarchy before the stub is created. In th case of electro-stub it looks okay (at least as far as the second point is concerned), but if you're planning to make any moe categories, we'd like to know first! Oh, and if you're interested in helping sort stubs, we're always looking for new members of the project! Grutness|^hello? 09:30, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi again - you wrote: Sorry for adding the sub out of term, thanks for your message to tell me how to do it correctly. I've added it to the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Criteria page and I won't continue to re-classify subs until I get some sort of conformation that I can.

I saw your note there... personally, I think there shouldn't be much problem with this one (it's some of those that are clearly never going to have many stubs that are the real problem). You've probably got more chance of this being accepted if you can show there's a need for it, though, so I wouldn't stop finding things to categories in it. A category with 40-50 stubs is far less likely to warrant deletion than one with only four or five! Make sure that the ones you find wouldn't better fit into one of the other tech categories though. Grutness|^hello?

10:16, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Australian 5note back.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Australian 5note back.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Australian 5note front.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Australian 5note front.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Australian 100note back.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Australian 100note back.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Fire lizard

I have nominated Fire lizard, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire lizard. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Them From Space 20:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dragons (Pern)

The article Dragons (Pern) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dragons (Pern) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dragons (Pern) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragons (Pern) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]