Talk:1984 Canadian federal election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Governments High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Untitled

It resulted in the Progressive Conservative Party winning the largest majority government in Canadian history. -- Uh.... the same thing (largest majority government) is also said in the Canadian federal election, 1958 article. Majromax 20:05, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Largest at the time. 1958 was THEN the largest majority. Mulroney passed it in 1984.Habsfannova 05:06, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But was Mulroney's majority really bigger than Diefenbaker's? It's true he got 3 more seats than Dief but in 1984 there were 17 more seats total than there were in '58 making Diefenbaker's majority bigger percentage-wise.--Lairor 14:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ndp70s.PNG

Image:Ndp70s.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lib80s.PNG

Image:Lib80s.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ndp70s.PNG

Image:Ndp70s.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1993 edit

I suppose that this revert of my edit, with its laconic edit summary, needs an explanation before I revert the revert.

First of all, my edit included a valuable link[1] to the 1993 election, which was being referenced. This alone, in my opinion, makes the revert seem careless, and warrants my reversion.
However, I suspect that this was not the reason that the fine editor reverted me. I suspect it had to do with the wording I employed, including the use of "themselves". Let me explain further:

The previous wording was as follows: . . . the Liberals suffered the worst defeat at the time for a governing party at the federal level. Only the Progressive Conservatives would face a larger defeat in 1993. I simply found this wording a bit wanting. For one thing, to me anyway, it seems to be a bit of obvious irony that the party that, in 1984, provided the worst drubbing of all time, would then, only nine years later, see their achievement eclipsed and to themselves be the victims of that eclipsation [I hereby provide free license to anyone wishing to make use of that newly coined word]. If a greater electoral defeat had been suffered in 1993 by, say, the NDP, then I would be largely okay with the wording and would not have made the change.

It's quite possible for me to believe that my point is impossible for others to see. It's even more believable that someone could word it better than it was with either my edit or the previous edit. In the spirit of Wikipedia, I'll leave it alone for now and wait for some other opinions before making any further changes. 98.71.218.201 (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What you wrote: "...would face a larger defeat, that coming in 1993." Which doesn't make sense. It sounds like you tried to say "that coming election in 1993." Which is incorrect, the next election after 1984 was 1988. 117Avenue (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. As per Gonnym, this is uncontroversial and can be closed. Number 5 7 20:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian federal election, 1984 → 1984 Canadian federal election – Per change in WP:NC-GAL. This had been moved to that title, but was moved back without a proper explanation. John M Wolfson (talk) 02:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per guideline, but you should have just made this a WP:RMT request to revert the previous move. No need to gain a new consensus for something that the community had a RfC and guideline for. This is no exception. --Gonnym (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Turner 1968 cropped.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]